tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20834827.post4391656677746004070..comments2023-05-09T15:23:03.078+01:00Comments on rossinisbird: Origins, Climate, Science and Ignorancerossinisbirdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13603999666618810285noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20834827.post-62828117097561828092009-11-26T09:31:02.314+00:002009-11-26T09:31:02.314+00:00Sorry mate when I checked yesterday morning Blogge...Sorry mate when I checked yesterday morning Blogger's Google's servers only offered me the Geek post as your latest offering. We might all be able to restore trust in peer review just as soon as some action is taken at the CRU. Whilst this dark cloud hangs over their head they will serve as a pertinent example of how to apply a nasty stain to a clean shirt.<br /><br />How is it possible to support, with a clear conscience, peer review in this particular branch of science when there is so much evidence of collusion in the emails?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20834827.post-79040157255154473962009-11-26T00:53:13.824+00:002009-11-26T00:53:13.824+00:00I just wanted to provide some balance. As I said, ...I just wanted to provide some balance. As I said, the article doesn't necessarily reflect my views.The Merry Traderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14419305922721295446noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20834827.post-36023585185104146792009-11-26T00:25:12.677+00:002009-11-26T00:25:12.677+00:00David, I've read the article. As well as being...David, I've read the article. As well as being shamelessly biased, it's little more than an appeal to authority. No scientific evidence seems to have been presented to support these '160 scientists' assertions.<br /><br />If you could describe to me what perspective you see it would be enlightening.rossinisbirdhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13603999666618810285noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20834827.post-79394832592530807022009-11-25T15:17:47.670+00:002009-11-25T15:17:47.670+00:00the answer to that is "nothing", nothing...the answer to that is "nothing", nothing is stopping the gasses from escaping further up into the atmosphere.<br /><br />and if in the case of greenhouse gasses being trapped in the atmosphere, then how come our planet didn't burn up billions of years ago, surely millions of years of volcanic activity would have built up enough c02 and dangerous greenhouse gasses to destroy the ozone layer and the earth.....<br /><br />another thing is that the ozone is always replenishing itself, ozone is being recreated ALL the time, thats why cfc's are not a problem either, cfc gasses pass through the ozone and breaks down to its basic components when bombarded by ultraviolet radiation, scientists say that one base component "chlorine" drops back down through the ozone layer, one chlorine atom can destroy hundreds of thousands of ozone atoms, im sure they can prove that point in a laborotry, but they cant prove that the chlorine actually falls back through the ozone layer, and its a moot point anyway, because the oceans and the earth itself releases chlorine into the atmosphere anyway, and it has done for billions of years, so if chlorine was a problem, then why hasn't the earth already become a burnt up ball bereft of life eons ago ?<br /><br />and if greenhouse gasses are such a "global" problem, then why is there only "ozone thinning" (as opposed to an actual hole) found at the poles ? (which even global alarmists admit is a seasonal event) why isn't there ozone holes/thinnings found all around the globe ?<br /><br />ozone can be found anywhere between 10 and 50 thousand feet up, so i find it ludicrous that scientists can claim that there is less ozone than in previous decades, measuring accurately would be impossible, these global warming scientists are either very inept at there job, or they are liars, many of them are possibly both, and as for the real cause of global warming, look up solar flares.<br /><br />and i cant believe just how fucking stupid and gullible that you supposedly "learned" people really are, you are being fooled by liars and idiots.Fuckmohammedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15902072895363092910noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20834827.post-80141426805541337622009-11-25T15:17:13.676+00:002009-11-25T15:17:13.676+00:00global warming scientists contradict themselves, s...global warming scientists contradict themselves, scientists say...[Ozone (O3) high in the atmosphere absorbs ultraviolet radiation from the sun, thereby protecting living organisms below from this dangerous radiation. The term ‘ozone hole’ refers to recent depletion of this protective layer over Earth's polar regions. People, plants, and animals living under the ozone hole are harmed by the solar radiation now reaching the Earth's surface—where it causes health problems from eye damage to skin cancer.<br /><br />The ozone hole, however, is not the mechanism of global warming. Ultraviolet radiation represents less than one percent of the energy from the sun—not enough to be the cause of the excess heat from human activities. Global warming is caused primarily from putting too much carbon into the atmosphere when coal, gas, and oil are burned to generate electricity or to run our cars. These gases spread around the planet like a blanket, capturing the solar heat that would otherwise be radiated out into space. <br /><br />ok, now get this........<br /><br />[over 90% of greenhouse gas is water vapour and falls back to earth, this happens on a daily basis]<br /><br />first they say that greenhouse gasses are depleting the ozone layer, and the ozone layer absorbs ultra violet radiation, but..<br /><br />IF these greenhouse gasses "spread around the planet like a blanket, capturing the solar heat that would otherwise be radiated out into space."...<br /><br />then it stands to reason that these dangerous greenhouse gasses have already passed through the ozone layer in order to trap the ultraviolet radiation, because if it didn't pass through the ozone layer, then the dangerous radiation would have already been deflected which means that the greenhouse gasses never got a chance to trap the radiation..<br /><br />and if the so-called greenhouse gasses have already passed upward through the ozone layer, what is suppose to be stopping the greenhouse gasses from continueing up further into the atmosphere and dissipating into space the same way it has for billions of years ?Fuckmohammedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15902072895363092910noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20834827.post-36840069743010894752009-11-25T12:53:39.072+00:002009-11-25T12:53:39.072+00:00Charming.
Anyway, check out this article:
http:/...Charming.<br /><br />Anyway, check out this article:<br /><br />http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/tech-mainmenu-30/environment/2337-scientists-say-whoa-on-climate-legislation<br /><br />Not saying I agree with it, but it does offer a perspective.The Merry Traderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14419305922721295446noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20834827.post-70369643034592903712009-11-25T09:40:42.845+00:002009-11-25T09:40:42.845+00:00Bastard!
I was going to use that mutual masturba...Bastard! <br />I was going to use that mutual masturbation line. Now I’ve had to go and change it to wankfest.Bryanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08977396587904008254noreply@blogger.com