From South Tyneside Friends of the Earth, and with the kind permission of Dan Alliband of BAN Waste, a report on another council revolt, but this time in Sunderland - and how the opposition left the meeting in disgust at the Labour council's undemocratic ploy to keep the Waste Strategy secret:
"About 30 people were on the public gallery at Sunderland Civic on Wednesday evening of 30th January when the council proposed to eject public and press to allow councillors to look at the ‘Business Case’ for the Joint Waste Management Partnership."
Note - despite several Freedom of Information requests, the Business Case has been withheld from the public.
"Sunderland council's argument was based on the argument that it was in the public’s interest as council tax payers to not disclose budget figures for whatever they were planning, because the private bidders would then know what to bid up to. The independents and conservatives put up a case against this to support ‘freedom of information’ and that it was not in the public’s interest for the discussion to be private. Why should people be denied access to all other information about the plans (e.g. locations and treatments etc).
"There was a vote – and 22 voted against the public being ejected, and 47 voted for, at this point the 22 councillors walked out (the council make up is 57 LAB, 1 LIB, 4 Independents and 13 TORY – so this I think this included all independents & Tories and possibly the Lib, and odd Lab back-bencher!?).
"While the Labour councillors jibed how undemocratic it was that the Tories not wanting to discuss the item while they voted so solidly against Freedom of Information was laughable!
"The mayor adjourned the meeting for 5 minutes while the public were asked to leave, but a handful stayed, including FOE members, and the police were called. The mayor and his labour chums returned to the chamber and declared that the agenda item would have to be deferred to next month.
"The remaining members of the public then left by a side exit to avoid the police who had seemingly arrived at the main reception!"
Friday Cephalopod: I succumb to peer pressure and will mention Octopolis
-
Friday Cephalopod: I succumb to peer pressure and will mention Octopolis
Wow. Every person on the planet saw one version or another of this
"Octopolis" st...
7 years ago
1 comment:
The South Tyne and Wear Waste Management Partnership is the brain child of Gateshead, Sunderland and South Tyneside Councils, the idea to burn its others rubbish via a massive incinerator built in one the Boroughs. It will be up and running by 2012 at the latest. The project will cost £1.6 billion, with Sunderland paying £772 million. You don’t need a calculator to work the rest out. I personally think the [plant will be built in either Sunderland or Gateshead as they have the required industrial land currently unused. South Tyneside will however, play some part, perhaps in pre processing. The preferred model is “Waste to Energy” whereby they burn all the rubbish to produce a little bit of electricity. The Isle of Man currently has such a plant. The other form is “Mechanical Biological Treatment with Aerobic Digestion”. No, please don’t laugh! What this means is “crush it and burnt it”: they honestly have tried to hide this method with scientific bull shit! Sunderland city Council have been extremely obstructive when it comes to Freedom of Information Enquiries, which is always a sign that all is not well when it comes to what is best for the community.
With nearly £2 billion up for grabs, this project is ripe for financial mis-management, never mind the environmental consequences. I would suspect to see the usual names crop up: Balfour Beatty, Premier Waste Management, and who knows, our own Ian Malcolm and Sovereign Strategy may have a roll to play, such is the richness of the pie which is being sliced up.
Post a Comment